http://www.sngicons.com/geeklog/blogs//article.php?story=20080414133301875
- Situation explained....check
- Read on player....check
- Misplayed both hands....check
- Second hand opponents cards revealed....ummm, no
- Reason for dumb betting amounts....ummm, no it's just retarded
- An explanation of how this "bad player" got from 30k to 72k chips....ummm, no it would ruin the main point of his post
- Brag post about qualifying for the WSOP ME....ummm, no I guess he didn't qualify
- Tournament bustout hand....ummm, no I guess he got wrecked continuously trying to "outplay" the big stacks because "they should always fold because they have likely qualified anyway with 25 players left and NINE getting a seat"
OK, almost half a good blog entry, which is a major improvement for noodleman.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
It's standard not to reveal the hands as that would influence people's reaction. For instance if his AQ is good ppl will likely say "stdrd" and if his AQ is no good they will flame him for being an idiot. Didn't you know that?
I've yet to see any evidence that stalker knows poker.
So far he's grossly underestimated the number of SNGs a grinder plays in an hour and ragged on someone for not posting results.
Also, his clamoring for the bustout hand is pretty telling. Often the bustout is completely standard and uninteresting. Everyone has seen a million standard shoves into people that wake up with a call hand, failing to mention the exact details isn't hiding something, especially if it takes away from analysis of a legitimately interesting hand.
I can say with a lot of confidence that I know a TON more about poker than you do.
Post a Comment